It was my early theory that the PMO et al, in the days leading to convoy, were likely spent contemplating a replay of United We Roll, in the Winter of 2019. Remembered mostly by the former Clerk, at the House of Commons committee hearing on SNC, referencing it in his preamble ‘fear for safety’ plea which became prominent story, and helpful story for the government.
So their comms ethic of ‘never let a perfectly good crisis go to waste’ had them noodling overtime on how to turn the convoy into a political win. Rather than, say, governing. Checking on public safety officials across the federal family on what to expect and how they were preparing took a backseat. Early signs on the scale of trouble intended by the protesters were left to the hired help.
No one should be surprised by any of this. It’s pretty much the unseriousness of statecraft in Ottawa. Even DM types have grown accustomed to servicing only the constant and exclusively political considerations of their masters.
Some pundits and media say it’s like ‘watching the sausage get made’. From my time there, this is hot dog bordering on dog food making. And not the good hot dog or dog food brands.
Testimony isn’t over yet. But to date, best I can tell, no official has cited ‘legislative intent’ in describing their advice/decision to invoke the Act. And more specifically, their take on the ‘test’. Put another way, how did the Parliament of the day arrive at the test. It should have been their first and primary guide. But nowadays, I gather, you just get a legal opinion you can work with and whistle the rest of the way.
I think this shows that literally nobody in the government was actually concerned about "threats or acts of serious violence" - a necessary criterion for legally invoking the EA.
It also shows that they couldn't care less about any actual inconvenience to actual Ottawa residents. Zexi Li and her friends were only ever, at best, props in the government's stage play.
The only thing that mattered at all to the government was whether the convoy would erode their public support.
Thanks to a slavish media, they got better results on that score than, in any decent world, they deserved.
‘Not only did the government of Canada have trouble clearing roads and highways during the February mess, it seems to have forgotten how to deliver the mail.’ This is the content I’m here for.
As always, Paul, the Trudeaucrats and their staffers live down to my expectations. No, truthfully, today they are below my expectations.
Again, as always, thank you for your stellar work. Finding this "stuff" [I dare not use the proper descriptive or your censors might rebel] is a lot of work but very important.
Just imagine the marketing brain powers that came up with “fringe minority with unacceptable views”. (I’ll bet the email exchanges and text messages of that rotten stunt will never see the light of day).
Similar to the wreckage in Nova Scotia, managing the PR angle is THE issue. It’s hardly any wonder that an intelligence report about Chinese meddling in 11 election races has been deep sixed...they haven’t figured out how to capitalize on it yet.
The OPP lawyer confronted Mendocino during his testimony to reveal that the day after the Ambassador bridge was cleared and in spite of the apparent imminent danger to all of Canada Mendocino wanted to visit the Ambassador bridge for a photo-op. The OPP stopped him. Bill Blair was the chief of police in Toronto during the G20 and allowed Black Bloc vandals to smash store windows and burn police cars on Saturday. On Sunday he had his officers round up and arrest innocent people under the guise of doing something. That is Bill Blair. The head of CSIS originally told Trudeau there was no threat to national security and warned him invoking the EA could inflame the situation. The government arranged a private meeting with the Commission so on Nov 5 the head of CSIS attended that meeting and he changed his testimony to say he actually told Trudeau to invoke the EA. because he had been given a legal opinion (courtesy David Lametti) that there was a national
security threat???. Brenda Lucki attended the Feb 13/22 cabinet meeting and knew there was finally a signed off plan to start police action. She said she didn't reveal that information to the cabinet meeting because she wasn't asked to speak????? The government knew about the plan. She said she told Mendocino earlier. This is just more government game playing to suit their narrative. We have seen it time and time again They wanted a U.S. Jan 6, didn't get it. The EA would enact harm on the protestors who dared stand up to Trudeau.
Just think. what the situation would be now if Trudeau had never mandated vaccines which he originally said he would not do.
Almost beyond satire, so thank you for finding some humor here.
I liked this bit:
“Thanks. I had an initial chat with my boss and he’s supportive but wants to wait a day or two. There’s a danger that if we come down too hard they might push out the crazies.”
Their major anxiety was that there would not be enough extremists in the mix to support their narrative...
This is the consistent, enduring, and irrefutable theme from the convoy-cum-protest-cum-occupation, all three orders of government and their main players -- elected and politico hacks alike -- along with their respective police forces (serving and protecting themselves at the leadership echelon?), a disproportionate if not consuming focus on "narratives", "communications opportunities", and an illuminating yet infuriating abdication of leadership to simply do the right thing as evidenced by their exchanges over email, texts, and WhatsApp chat groups. During this whole episode of our history, we were (and remain so) poorly served and governed by our inferiors ... we need an Emergencies Act to freeze many political careers and consequent powers to vacate a host of Cabinet seats. And Steve Kelly's post below is full or more merit and experience than I have, I commend it to all for full reading.
We all have the luxury of hindsight and it shows in the comments clearly. It would be good to remember that there was less than a week to respond to the convoy and until they actually arrived no one knew what they would do, in Ottawa or anywhere else. So having aha moments over emails is simply silly. Some of us simply regurgitate the same sorry old complaints or hurt feelings and odd comparisons with issues that have nothing to do with the Inquiry. There is the continuing disdain for the people of Ottawa who normally take protests in stride and the snide comments about one of only two residents who spoke at the Inquiry which concerns me.
Never do I hear why the “truckers” didn’t protest earlier. The mandate was announced in mid-October, coming into effect in mid-January. Yeah, there is Halloween and Remembrance Day (right, very important to the convoy crowd) and then Xmas and New Year’s parties. I’ve watched most of the Inquiry. I really like the transcripts. But all of Freedom Corp. said it just came together so fast all on its own. No one even talked about it back in Oct. or Nov. ’21. So how important was it really?
Branden “from Alberta” Miller, with the unfortunate comb-over, seems to have lost his way now that he’s got the actual pols in front of him. I missed his antics by about half an hour yesterday (I’m 3 hrs over) and at first I didn’t notice anything amiss. There seemed to be more people in the main room’s audience than there had been lately. Soon I get a little pop-up that took me to the day’s news and Miller’s interview, outside and angry. But as the judge said, “It’s not about you.” I am glad he was allowed back in. The emails and texts are interesting. That’s not the right word. Intriguing, fascinating? I don’t understand why anyone would expect staffers (or minions) or Mayors or Ministers to text and email any differently than anyone else. Especially when they don’t expect to have it read out to an audience. Holier than tho is rampant, isn’t it?
So no one is getting “othered”. Amusing to hear this word from someone who cheerfully tosses “snowflake,” “woke”, “triggered” and the like. It’s a shame though, I remember when “fringe” was cool.
Blair has always creeped me out. I’d expect nothing better from him really. The rest so far seem competent and I for one was thrilled that the EA worked so well.
Political staffers no matter the party, especially the one working in communication, are there to create political spins from any possible situations. They are the original trolls.
My wife and I are living in the most populated Montréal Cotes-des-Neiges Notre-Dame-De-Grâce burrow in Montréal. We have contributed to elect Project Montréal for the last 2 elections, and we were not unhappy that E. Montgomery was no longer representing Project Montréal last year. We heard a lot about the Ottawa staffer and the cultural clash that took place with the people working for the burrow. Our federal electoral county is Mont-Royal, often referred as “petite municipalité cossue”, that used to be represented by P.E. Trudeau. Justin Trudeau is our current next-door deputy in the much lower income Park-Extension. As well described by Mr. Wells and as most urban citizens, we Montrealer’s are mainly progressive and we tend to believe that Liberals are the less bad bet for us to be represented at the federal level.
With regard to the Ottawa trucker events, both my wife and I were wondering why this controversial law was not called earlier, especially when it became evident that D. Ford conservative leader would not do anything about it and that Ottawa city looked so much overwhelmed. By Contrast our conservative F. Legault leader was very much visible to keep the Québec city trucker’s rally within limits. On the other end, I personally prefer police showing more restraint than less, excessive police force is too often observed elsewhere in the world during large protests.
I believe that many french speaking quebecers are not as much desperate for individual rights that it seems to be for our English speaking neighbours here in Montréal and all over the world were english is the main language. Our France roots are very much alive, we are bringing a different point of view in general, in my opinion more for the better than for the worse.
In any case I would like to add this for Paul: all your letters (I am not paying 😊) are very much appreciated and I hope that you will be allowed to take a well-deserved vacation soon !
I'm not fully following your argument here, Paul. Comms has always been and will always be a core part of both politics and government. Should Bill Blair have actually done something to help Ric McIver? Absolutely. But it's also Bill Blair's staff's job to make sure that Canadians know what's going on, lest they, say, start mistaking a white-supremacist-led terrorist attack for a "peaceful protest". I share your wish that the government had handled this situation more swiftly, but they also needed to communicate with us.
Just heard the E. Spaulding invu-- so good, thanks. Her genius got sadly watered down playing with the NAC orchestra IMHO but I'm all the more keen to see her in a small ensemble, or the opera project, ASAP.
As if the Trudeau Liberals invented annoying, comms-obsessed political staffers, lol. And as if His Majesty's Loyal Opposition doesn't have the exact same stable of eager young boys and girls in short pants, trying to frame the issues and events of the day in a way that makes their bosses look great and the other side look terrible. For example, the narrative that if Trudeau wasn't such a snobby Laurentian elite he could have just gone down to Wellington and heard folks out on their plan to overthrow the Canadian government in favour of a cabal of Mary Simon, a bunch of Senators, and some random convoy chuckleheads, and everything would have been fine, but instead he had to run crying for the EA just like his dad. And give them credit, this narrative is so compelling that even Mr. Wells bought it :) But seriously, as annoying as staffers can be, they actually serve a useful role in our democratic system: they give their ministerial bosses advice on the political ramifications of how they exercise their public offices, so that our non-partisan public service doesn't have to sully itself with such tawdy affairs. These things might look crass in the harsh light of a public inquiry, but they're normal. If Wells isn't careful he's going to end up like Coyne, forever being shocked and appalled that politics is so political.
It was my early theory that the PMO et al, in the days leading to convoy, were likely spent contemplating a replay of United We Roll, in the Winter of 2019. Remembered mostly by the former Clerk, at the House of Commons committee hearing on SNC, referencing it in his preamble ‘fear for safety’ plea which became prominent story, and helpful story for the government.
So their comms ethic of ‘never let a perfectly good crisis go to waste’ had them noodling overtime on how to turn the convoy into a political win. Rather than, say, governing. Checking on public safety officials across the federal family on what to expect and how they were preparing took a backseat. Early signs on the scale of trouble intended by the protesters were left to the hired help.
No one should be surprised by any of this. It’s pretty much the unseriousness of statecraft in Ottawa. Even DM types have grown accustomed to servicing only the constant and exclusively political considerations of their masters.
Some pundits and media say it’s like ‘watching the sausage get made’. From my time there, this is hot dog bordering on dog food making. And not the good hot dog or dog food brands.
Testimony isn’t over yet. But to date, best I can tell, no official has cited ‘legislative intent’ in describing their advice/decision to invoke the Act. And more specifically, their take on the ‘test’. Put another way, how did the Parliament of the day arrive at the test. It should have been their first and primary guide. But nowadays, I gather, you just get a legal opinion you can work with and whistle the rest of the way.
I think this shows that literally nobody in the government was actually concerned about "threats or acts of serious violence" - a necessary criterion for legally invoking the EA.
It also shows that they couldn't care less about any actual inconvenience to actual Ottawa residents. Zexi Li and her friends were only ever, at best, props in the government's stage play.
The only thing that mattered at all to the government was whether the convoy would erode their public support.
Thanks to a slavish media, they got better results on that score than, in any decent world, they deserved.
‘Not only did the government of Canada have trouble clearing roads and highways during the February mess, it seems to have forgotten how to deliver the mail.’ This is the content I’m here for.
This whole mess has me shaking my head. No wonder so many of us ‘have difficulties trusting the narrative’ out of Ottawa.
As always, Paul, the Trudeaucrats and their staffers live down to my expectations. No, truthfully, today they are below my expectations.
Again, as always, thank you for your stellar work. Finding this "stuff" [I dare not use the proper descriptive or your censors might rebel] is a lot of work but very important.
It started out bad, and quickly tapered off.
Just imagine the marketing brain powers that came up with “fringe minority with unacceptable views”. (I’ll bet the email exchanges and text messages of that rotten stunt will never see the light of day).
Similar to the wreckage in Nova Scotia, managing the PR angle is THE issue. It’s hardly any wonder that an intelligence report about Chinese meddling in 11 election races has been deep sixed...they haven’t figured out how to capitalize on it yet.
The OPP lawyer confronted Mendocino during his testimony to reveal that the day after the Ambassador bridge was cleared and in spite of the apparent imminent danger to all of Canada Mendocino wanted to visit the Ambassador bridge for a photo-op. The OPP stopped him. Bill Blair was the chief of police in Toronto during the G20 and allowed Black Bloc vandals to smash store windows and burn police cars on Saturday. On Sunday he had his officers round up and arrest innocent people under the guise of doing something. That is Bill Blair. The head of CSIS originally told Trudeau there was no threat to national security and warned him invoking the EA could inflame the situation. The government arranged a private meeting with the Commission so on Nov 5 the head of CSIS attended that meeting and he changed his testimony to say he actually told Trudeau to invoke the EA. because he had been given a legal opinion (courtesy David Lametti) that there was a national
security threat???. Brenda Lucki attended the Feb 13/22 cabinet meeting and knew there was finally a signed off plan to start police action. She said she didn't reveal that information to the cabinet meeting because she wasn't asked to speak????? The government knew about the plan. She said she told Mendocino earlier. This is just more government game playing to suit their narrative. We have seen it time and time again They wanted a U.S. Jan 6, didn't get it. The EA would enact harm on the protestors who dared stand up to Trudeau.
Just think. what the situation would be now if Trudeau had never mandated vaccines which he originally said he would not do.
Almost beyond satire, so thank you for finding some humor here.
I liked this bit:
“Thanks. I had an initial chat with my boss and he’s supportive but wants to wait a day or two. There’s a danger that if we come down too hard they might push out the crazies.”
Their major anxiety was that there would not be enough extremists in the mix to support their narrative...
This is the consistent, enduring, and irrefutable theme from the convoy-cum-protest-cum-occupation, all three orders of government and their main players -- elected and politico hacks alike -- along with their respective police forces (serving and protecting themselves at the leadership echelon?), a disproportionate if not consuming focus on "narratives", "communications opportunities", and an illuminating yet infuriating abdication of leadership to simply do the right thing as evidenced by their exchanges over email, texts, and WhatsApp chat groups. During this whole episode of our history, we were (and remain so) poorly served and governed by our inferiors ... we need an Emergencies Act to freeze many political careers and consequent powers to vacate a host of Cabinet seats. And Steve Kelly's post below is full or more merit and experience than I have, I commend it to all for full reading.
We all have the luxury of hindsight and it shows in the comments clearly. It would be good to remember that there was less than a week to respond to the convoy and until they actually arrived no one knew what they would do, in Ottawa or anywhere else. So having aha moments over emails is simply silly. Some of us simply regurgitate the same sorry old complaints or hurt feelings and odd comparisons with issues that have nothing to do with the Inquiry. There is the continuing disdain for the people of Ottawa who normally take protests in stride and the snide comments about one of only two residents who spoke at the Inquiry which concerns me.
Never do I hear why the “truckers” didn’t protest earlier. The mandate was announced in mid-October, coming into effect in mid-January. Yeah, there is Halloween and Remembrance Day (right, very important to the convoy crowd) and then Xmas and New Year’s parties. I’ve watched most of the Inquiry. I really like the transcripts. But all of Freedom Corp. said it just came together so fast all on its own. No one even talked about it back in Oct. or Nov. ’21. So how important was it really?
Branden “from Alberta” Miller, with the unfortunate comb-over, seems to have lost his way now that he’s got the actual pols in front of him. I missed his antics by about half an hour yesterday (I’m 3 hrs over) and at first I didn’t notice anything amiss. There seemed to be more people in the main room’s audience than there had been lately. Soon I get a little pop-up that took me to the day’s news and Miller’s interview, outside and angry. But as the judge said, “It’s not about you.” I am glad he was allowed back in. The emails and texts are interesting. That’s not the right word. Intriguing, fascinating? I don’t understand why anyone would expect staffers (or minions) or Mayors or Ministers to text and email any differently than anyone else. Especially when they don’t expect to have it read out to an audience. Holier than tho is rampant, isn’t it?
So no one is getting “othered”. Amusing to hear this word from someone who cheerfully tosses “snowflake,” “woke”, “triggered” and the like. It’s a shame though, I remember when “fringe” was cool.
Blair has always creeped me out. I’d expect nothing better from him really. The rest so far seem competent and I for one was thrilled that the EA worked so well.
Political staffers no matter the party, especially the one working in communication, are there to create political spins from any possible situations. They are the original trolls.
My wife and I are living in the most populated Montréal Cotes-des-Neiges Notre-Dame-De-Grâce burrow in Montréal. We have contributed to elect Project Montréal for the last 2 elections, and we were not unhappy that E. Montgomery was no longer representing Project Montréal last year. We heard a lot about the Ottawa staffer and the cultural clash that took place with the people working for the burrow. Our federal electoral county is Mont-Royal, often referred as “petite municipalité cossue”, that used to be represented by P.E. Trudeau. Justin Trudeau is our current next-door deputy in the much lower income Park-Extension. As well described by Mr. Wells and as most urban citizens, we Montrealer’s are mainly progressive and we tend to believe that Liberals are the less bad bet for us to be represented at the federal level.
With regard to the Ottawa trucker events, both my wife and I were wondering why this controversial law was not called earlier, especially when it became evident that D. Ford conservative leader would not do anything about it and that Ottawa city looked so much overwhelmed. By Contrast our conservative F. Legault leader was very much visible to keep the Québec city trucker’s rally within limits. On the other end, I personally prefer police showing more restraint than less, excessive police force is too often observed elsewhere in the world during large protests.
I believe that many french speaking quebecers are not as much desperate for individual rights that it seems to be for our English speaking neighbours here in Montréal and all over the world were english is the main language. Our France roots are very much alive, we are bringing a different point of view in general, in my opinion more for the better than for the worse.
In any case I would like to add this for Paul: all your letters (I am not paying 😊) are very much appreciated and I hope that you will be allowed to take a well-deserved vacation soon !
I'm not fully following your argument here, Paul. Comms has always been and will always be a core part of both politics and government. Should Bill Blair have actually done something to help Ric McIver? Absolutely. But it's also Bill Blair's staff's job to make sure that Canadians know what's going on, lest they, say, start mistaking a white-supremacist-led terrorist attack for a "peaceful protest". I share your wish that the government had handled this situation more swiftly, but they also needed to communicate with us.
Just heard the E. Spaulding invu-- so good, thanks. Her genius got sadly watered down playing with the NAC orchestra IMHO but I'm all the more keen to see her in a small ensemble, or the opera project, ASAP.
As if the Trudeau Liberals invented annoying, comms-obsessed political staffers, lol. And as if His Majesty's Loyal Opposition doesn't have the exact same stable of eager young boys and girls in short pants, trying to frame the issues and events of the day in a way that makes their bosses look great and the other side look terrible. For example, the narrative that if Trudeau wasn't such a snobby Laurentian elite he could have just gone down to Wellington and heard folks out on their plan to overthrow the Canadian government in favour of a cabal of Mary Simon, a bunch of Senators, and some random convoy chuckleheads, and everything would have been fine, but instead he had to run crying for the EA just like his dad. And give them credit, this narrative is so compelling that even Mr. Wells bought it :) But seriously, as annoying as staffers can be, they actually serve a useful role in our democratic system: they give their ministerial bosses advice on the political ramifications of how they exercise their public offices, so that our non-partisan public service doesn't have to sully itself with such tawdy affairs. These things might look crass in the harsh light of a public inquiry, but they're normal. If Wells isn't careful he's going to end up like Coyne, forever being shocked and appalled that politics is so political.
Thank you Paul!